
IPM News
L.P.Berkett, IPM Specialist
Novermber 3, 1998
In This Issue....
A Look Back at the Season's Pest Situation
A Look Ahead -- Reducing Apple Scab Overwintering Inoculum
Table 1. Timeline for Vole Management
Links to further vole information
__________________________________________
A Look Back at the Season's Pest Situation
Pest Management Overview:Although there were higher levels of scab around Vermont, our situation does not appear to be as severe as some of our neighboring states. Contributing factors to the increase in scab included: (1) the relatively warm winter and adequate to good snow cover produced favorable conditions for the overwintering inoculum; (2) the growing season was very early and as soon as there was green tissue (1/4"- 1/2") we had an infection period with temps in the high 50's- low 60F. This was unusually warm for an early season infection period and could have influenced ascospore release. The earliness of the season caught some growers off guard and unprepared to spray; (3) lesions that developed from the earliest infection period were present at the beginning of bloom and the extended rainy period that lasted for days. Therefore, there were potentially ascospores and conidia being released during all that rain; (4) The rain and wind hampered the timely application of fungicides during and at the end of bloom; and (5) the summer continued to be wet --the wettest on record. Other states in the region (eastern NY, NH, ME) have reported 'record years' for scab damage. Potentially, the wet summer was also very favorable for sooty blotch and flyspeck development. However, fungicides used for scab management helped to keep these diseases in check. The wet weather also played a role in the development of moldy core. It appeared that there was a higher incidence this year than in previous years.
The weather also had an impact on powdery mildew development. The relatively warm winter and early spring weather were favorable for its development. More powdery mildew was observed than 'normal', particularly in blocks that did not receive SI fungicides.
In terms of arthropods, their management did not seem as challenging as disease management, for the most part. There were orchards that had problems with leafminers or leafhoppers but these pest situations were not as widespread as the disease situation. At the UVM Hort.Res.Center, it was a year where tarnished plant bug never reached threshold levels and plum curculio activity was far less than 'normal'. This same situation was reported in other New England states. Regarding the European red mite, it appears that the use of effective materials early in the season and the wet weather played a role in keeping their down populations.
Overall, 1998 will be remembered as the growing season that got a 'quick start ' and where the rains played havoc with disease management.
Reducing Apple Scab Overwintering Inoculum
As stated in the 1998-1999 New England Apple Pest Management Guide, research by Dr. William MacHardy has demonstrated that sanitation practices such as flail mowing fallen leaves in autumn or early spring (before bud break) or applying urea to fallen leaves decreases the amount of overwintering inoculum by approximately 50-75%. This means that for any one infection period, there would be approx. 50-75% fewer scab lesions compared to the number of lesions that would develop if there had been no sanitation practice. In addition, recent research in Canada has shown that the physical action of shredding leaves potentially can significantly reduce overwintering leafminer populations.
Are sanitation practices worth your time and effort? If you had a foliar scab problem this year, it is very questionable whether sanitation practices would lower your Potential Ascospore Dose (PAD) to the level where your orchard would be a candidate for the Delayed-Spray Strategy in 1999 --or in other words, where you could delay your first fungicide spray until Pink or until after three infection periods (but before the 4th infection period), whichever comes first.
Bottom line is that if you had foliar scab this year, you need to be prepared early to protect developing tissue from infection next year. If you can easily reduce the overwintering inoculum with a flail mower over the next few weeks-- it surely won't hurt and, in addition, it can even help with lowering overwinter leafminer populations.
For more information on Sanitation Practices, please see page 12 of the 1998-1999 New Apple Pest Management Guide.
In Vermont, two species of voles can cause damage to orchards: the meadow vole and the pine vole. The two species can be distinguished by the length of their tails, with the pine vole having a short tail (about 3/4" or less).
Activities aimed at managing vole populations should take place throughout the season (see Table 1 below). Please note the items listed under "Autumn."
Table 1. Timeline for Vole Management
Time of Year |
Management Techniques |
Spring |
|
|
|
|
|
Summer |
|
|
|
|
|
Autumn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winter |
|
With any management strategy, it is important to learn as much as you can about the species you are trying to manage. I hope you find the following information on vole biology, behavior, damage, monitoring, and further management ideas helpful to you -- it comes from the 1998-1999 Pennsylvania Tree Fruit Production Guide.
Voles are vegetarians, feeding on grasses, tubers, and seeds. They also consume the bark of young trees. Unlike many other small mammals, voles do not hibernate. Instead, they are active throughout the year, both day and night, with peak activity at dawn and dusk.
Meadow voles create surface runways in the grass, and in winter, they are active in these runways beneath the snow. Pine voles build underground tunnels in loose, crumbly soil. As they build the tunnels they push out dirt, producing small conical piles of soil on the ground surface. Both voles build large globular nests of dry grasses and leaves. The nests are located close to tree trunks, in tussocks of grass, and at the end of burrows.
Voles are extremely prolific. Their peak breeding activity occurs between March and October, but when winters are mild, voles may breed all year long. A female meadow vole could potentially produce over 70 young in a year, and the young voles become sexually mature at the age of 1 month. As a result, under ideal conditions vole populations can reach densities as high as 270 voles per acre. Scientists have found that voles exhibit regular population fluctuations at approximately 4-year intervals. Populations apparently crash to levels as low as 10 voles per acre after peak years and then begin to build up again. Extensive damage may occur in orchards, particularly during peak population years.
Voles may cause extensive damage to fruit trees and orchards as a result of girdling seedlings and trees and damaging roots. Damage occurs primarily during winter when other types of food are scarce. The most common form of tree injury caused by meadow voles is trunk girdling at or near the ground surface. Since voles burrow in the snow, they may damage tree trunks as high as snow accumulates. Young trees are especially susceptible to attack. Occasionally meadow voles will burrow in the soil and damage rootsresulting in weak, unhealthy trees.
Damage from pine voles is harder to detect, because it occurs underground as voles consume small roots, girdle large roots, and eat bark from the base of trees. By the time orchardists note weak, unhealthy trees, the damage is already extensive.
The most easily identified sign of meadow vole presence is a system of surface runways in the grass. Meadow voles create these runways by their feeding activities and keep them free of vegetation. The runways are generally about 1 1/2 inches wide. Bits of freshly cut vegetation and accumulations of vole droppings (brown or green in color and shaped like rice grains) in the runway are positive evidence they are being used. Vegetation, small roots, or mold in the runways indicate that the voles are no longer using them. Pine voles do not use surface runways, so their presence is much harder to detect. In apple orchards, tiny, elongated tooth marks on apples on the ground are signs of both meadow voles and pine voles.
The apple indexing method is a way to determine the distribution of voles in an orchard and their relative abundance. Place an apple with a slice removed into a meadow vole runway or in a pine vole tunnel. Check the apple after 24 hours for vole tooth marks. The presence of tooth marks will indicate where vole activity is highest and which trees are at risk. To obtain an estimate of the abundance of voles, weigh the apple before putting it out and after 24 hours. One pine vole consumes approximately 13 grams of apple in a 24-hour period and one meadow vole consumes about 20 grams.
Most orchardists do not need to know the exact number of voles present, but they may want to know whether the population is increasing or decreasing, or whether a particular treatment had an impact on population size. Monitoring vole numbers with the apple indexing method is a means of achieving these goals.
Trapping can also be used to assess the effectiveness of a vole-control program. Before initiating the control program, select approximately 10 trees and place four wooden-base (mouse-size) snap traps in runways near these trees (for trap placement see section on trapping below). Record the number of voles trapped in a 3- to 5-day period. After the control program is finished, set the traps in the same place and, for the same length of time, compare the number of voles caught after treatment with the number caught before treatment. If the program has been successful, you should trap no more than two or three voles.
The number of voles that can be tolerated is a trade-off between cost of control and cost of damage, and it depends on the orchardist. A single vole may cause damage, but most damage occurs at high population levels. Monitoring vole populations enables growers to assess when populations are starting to increase and to begin control programs at that time.
Hawks, owls, shrikes, snakes, weasels, raccoons, foxes, opossums, and house cats all feed on voles. These predators are beneficial in orchards because they help keep vole populations under control. Whenever possible, orchardists should encourage these predators, or at least not harass or kill them.
When natural controls are inadequate, artificial methods must be used to control vole populations. The fall is the best time for initiating control programs. A number of different control methods are listed below. The greatest success is usually achieved by using a variety of techniques at once.
In orchards, the major food sources for voles are normally not the fruit trees, but roots and stems of grasses and other groundcover. As a result, habitat modification, that is, reducing or eliminating grasses and cover, is one of the best long-term methods for controlling voles. Repeated mowings that maintain groundcover at a height of 3 to 6 inches serve to limit both food and cover and expose voles to predators. Where possible, mow both between trees in a row as well as along tree rows. Too much delay between mowings results in excessive vegetation which, when cut (especially with a sickle-bar mower), forms a thatch layer that protects voles. A flail or rotary mower is preferred for reducing thatch.
Establishing vegetation-free zones under tree canopies that extend at least 2 feet from tree trunks will discourage voles from living near the bases of trees, where they cause the most damage. Vegetation-free zones may be established by mowing, applying herbicides, cultivating, or placing a layer of crushed stone or gravel 3 to 4 inches deep that extends 15 to 18 inches from the trunk. Do not allow mulch, prunings, or decaying vegetation to accumulate around the bases of trees or in tree rows.
Hardware cloth barriers can be used to keep voles from girdling small trees. Wrap a strip of 1/2-inch or less mesh hardware cloth around the base of small trees. The hardware cloth should be set 4 to 6 inches into the ground and be approximately 18 to 24 inches high. Use higher guards where snow may be deep. Tree guards should be large enough to allow for 5 years of growth. This method is very effective but extremely labor intensive and expensive when a larger number of trees need protection.
Trapping is not an efficient way of controlling voles in large orchards, but it is an effective and safe control method for small orchards or around selected trees. Use standard wooden-base snap traps (mouse size) and bait them with peanut butter, oatmeal, or apple slices. For meadow voles, place the traps in runways, flush with the ground and perpendicular to the runway. Place the trigger end in the runway. For pine voles, locate a tunnel and place the trap within the tunnel and perpendicular to it.
Links to further vole information:
If you would you like to read more about vole management and look at some pictures of the voles themselves and the damage they can cause, please see:
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu:80/ipmnet/ny/fruits/FruitFS/voles.html
http://www.canr.uconn.edu/CANR/ces/ipm/homegrnd/htms/volepics.htm
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Where trade names or commercial products are used for identification, no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is implied. Always read the label before using any pesticide. The label is the legal document for the product use. Disregard any information in this newsletter if it is in conflict with the label.