|
Disease Management Update
Apple Scab -
Protective Schedule to Prevent Infection
Given last year's scab situation, the focus in terms of disease
management in 1999 will be on apple scab. Throughout New England and the
Northeast, 1998 was considered one of the worst years for this disease. This means
that there is potentially higher than 'normal' overwintering inoculum in the orchard for
the 1999 growing season.
Similar to last year, we have had a relatively warm winter where either snow cover or
melting snow/rain have kept the leaves on the orchard floor insulated or wet - these are
conditions that are favorable for overwintering inoculum.
This situation points to an aggressive, protective strategy this year during the primary
scab period using materials such as captan, mancozeb (Dithane, Manzate, Penncozeb), and/or
metiram (Polyram) and making sure the first fungicide is applied before the first
infection period and continuing tight protection until the ascospores are released.
Note that if you choose to use the "Extended" program for the EBDC
fungicides (i.e., mancozebs, metiram) and use them as a 'stand alone' fungicide, your
dilute gallonage/A based on your tree row volume calculation should not be over 250
gallons nor should your trees have dense canopies. In these situations, you risk not
having enough material on the trees to be effective and should include another material,
such as a half rate of captan with the EBDC. This combination has worked well in the
Hudson Valley according to Dr. Dave Rosenberger. Another option with the EBDCs
on larger trees would be to follow the 'Prebloom/Bloom Only' program which allows a higher
rate. Whatever rate of EBDCs you may choose, they will have less of an impact on the
predacious mite, T.pyri if you do not apply them past bloom (see below under European Red
Mite section of this newsletter for more information on T.pyri in Vermont.) More
information on these programs can be found on page 59 of the 1998-1999 New England Apple
Pest Management Guide
Dodine (Syllit) would also be an option around your oil spray if resistance has not
developed in your orchard. Unfortunately, there is no practical laboratory test
to determine level of resistance in an orchard. Drs. Koller and Wilcox state in a
recent article that appeared in New York Fruit Quarterly (vol.6, no. 4, 1999) that the
level of resistance is related to orchard history (i.e., the total number of dodine
treatments an orchard has received). From their research, they have estimated that
the total number of dodine treatments that would drive an orchard "over the
edge" appears to be around 60 sprays. It does not matter whether these were
sprayed over a 10 or 30 year period. In their studies, they found that the
level of resistance in an orchard declined over time but using dodine only once would
drive the orchard back to "resistant" very quickly. The bottom line is
that if you do not know the history of dodine use in your orchard, any use of dodine is
risky.
And that leads into the topic
.
Judicious Use of SI Fungicides --- Concerns of Resistance
The following table illustrates the percentage of strains of the scab fungus resistant to
the SIs (i.e., sterol-inhibiting fungicides such as Nova, Rubigan, Procure) and dodine in
New York orchards based on research conducted by Drs. Koller and Wilcox:
|
|